Mind The Gap Advisory
  • Home
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Governance Continuity Assessment
    • AI & Cyber Crisis Tabletop
    • Governance and Decision Authority Engagement
    • ICS/OT Decision Authority
    • Readiness Center
  • Speaking
  • CrisisOS5™
  • Insights
  • About
  • Contact
Select Page
CIRCIA compliance and incident response: why decision authority is the missing piece

CIRCIA compliance and incident response: why decision authority is the missing piece

by amvandenhurk | May 27, 2026

By Ann Marie van den Hurk, Mind The Gap Advisory CIRCIA compliance and incident response: why decision authority is the missing piece CIRCIA compliance is moving from preparation to obligation. With the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act’s...
Who approves the first move in a cyber incident? | Mind The Gap Advisory

Who approves the first move in a cyber incident? | Mind The Gap Advisory

by amvandenhurk | May 15, 2026

Who approves the first move in a cyber incident?   By Ann Marie van den Hurk, Mind The Gap Advisory When a cyber incident begins, the first decisions are not technical. They happen before the security team has a complete picture. Before legal has reviewed...
Cyber incident response first hour: why the narrative sets without you

Cyber incident response first hour: why the narrative sets without you

by amvandenhurk | May 7, 2026

By Ann Marie van den Hurk, Mind The Gap Advisory   When the narrative sets without you: what the first hour of a cyber incident actually costs   In a cyber or AI-generated crisis, minute twenty feels like stabilization. The statement went out. The pressure...
Cyber crisis decision authority: why the first statement fails

Cyber crisis decision authority: why the first statement fails

by amvandenhurk | Apr 30, 2026

By Ann Marie van den Hurk, Mind The Gap Advisory   The first statement is not a communications problem When a cyber incident hits, most organizations discover something they should have resolved months earlier. Not a technology gap. Not a staffing gap. A decision...
Cyber Crisis Internal Alignment: Why Your Own Team Can Cause More Damage Than the Attacker

Cyber Crisis Internal Alignment: Why Your Own Team Can Cause More Damage Than the Attacker

by amvandenhurk | Apr 23, 2026

By Ann Marie van den Hurk, Mind The Gap Advisory   PwC’s Global Crisis and Resilience Survey found that a majority of executives expect their organizations to face a significant crisis within the next two years. Far fewer feel fully prepared to respond. The...
Is There an Executive Decision-Making Framework for Cyber and AI Crises? | Mind The Gap Advisory

Is There an Executive Decision-Making Framework for Cyber and AI Crises? | Mind The Gap Advisory

by amvandenhurk | Apr 21, 2026

By Ann Marie van den Hurk, Mind The Gap Advisory   Yes. But not the kind most organizations are looking for. When executives, CISOs, and board members search for an executive decision-making framework for cyber and AI crises, they typically find one of three...
« Older Entries
  • AI & Synthetic Media
  • Governance & Decision Authority
  • Cyber & OT Signals
  • Leadership & Crisis Response
  • Reputation & Narrative Risk
  • Operational Response Resources for Cyber & Comms Teams
  • Governance Readiness Under Speed
  • Our Privacy Policy
© 2010–2026 Mind The Gap Advisory. All rights reserved. CrisisOS5™ and “Resilience at the Speed of Risk” are trademarks of Mind The Gap Advisory. Use of this site and its products is subject to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.